top of page

Purpose: research-driven problem-design intervention

Breath is positioned as an exploratory design probe for studying how ambient cues and guided breathing interactions can support attention regulation and emotional self-awareness in non-clinical institutional environments.

The project does not function as a therapeutic or medical device, but as a qualitative tool for observing calm-oriented interaction behaviors.

Potential application contexts include educational settings, student support programs, and research initiatives focused on attention, habit formation, or wellbeing-related interaction patterns. The emphasis is placed on subjective engagement and behavioral observation rather than measurable outcomes, making the project suitable for early-stage institutional research.

r14.png

Behavioral wake-up system

Breath

Indivisual Project

Duration: 3 months

Problem Statement

Sudden wake-up mechanisms are associated with elevated stress responses, morning grogginess, and increased anxiety, negatively impacting users’ emotional and cognitive states at the start of the day.

Observed Effects

Abrupt audio cues induce immediate stress reactions during waking

Rapid sleep-to-wake transitions correlate with heightened cortisol response

Users report dissatisfaction with alarm systems that prioritize urgency over gradual engagement

Design Opportunity

How might a wake-up system enable a gradual, low-stress transition from sleep to wakefulness?

4ca57341-6ffb-4b5e-8c0b-3c930e7af677.png

Design Opportunity

The interaction design of Breath is grounded in research on stress perception, attention regulation, and ambient interaction rather than clinical intervention. Initial research indicated that individuals experiencing sustained cognitive load often struggle to engage with stress-reduction tools that require deliberate effort, extended time, or screen-based interaction. Instead, existing literature suggests that subtle, low-friction cues are more likely to support momentary self-regulation without disrupting ongoing tasks.

Studies in behavioral psychology and human–computer interaction have shown that paced breathing, when introduced through simple and non-intrusive prompts, can encourage short pauses and increased bodily awareness without requiring formal instruction. Research on ambient interfaces further suggests that light-based cues and slow rhythmic patterns are effective in guiding attention while remaining peripheral to primary activities (Weiser & Brown, 1997; Calm Technology; Gross, 2015).

 

Based on these findings, Breath incorporates three core interaction functions: gentle ambient light cues to signal moments of pause, guided breathing rhythm to support slow inhalation and exhalation, and minimal physical interaction to reduce cognitive demand. These functions were selected to lower the barrier to engagement while maintaining autonomy and avoiding prescriptive behavior.

Rather than aiming to reduce stress through measurement or performance tracking, the project focuses on creating conditions that make brief self-regulation behaviors more likely to occur. This logic positions Breath as a behavioral research probe, enabling observation of how users respond to calm-oriented cues in everyday institutional environments and providing a foundation for future applied research.

Screenshot 2026-01-21 004722.png
Screenshot 2026-01-21 004722.png
Screenshot 2026-01-21 004722.png

Research Insights

Through user interviews, diary studies, and sleep research review, key behavioral insights were identified to inform the design of a gentle wake-up system.

Research Methods

bc7e0d7a-93ae-4b97-9170-0109a07dd78b.png

Informal Interviews
Conversations with 8 individuals about their alarm usage and wake-up experiences.

a51a1986-8310-4228-9b94-71a79749e7d1.png

Informal Interviews
Conversations with 8 individuals about their alarm usage and wake-up experiences.

e9848193-af83-4bcd-be22-ffa30a887a2c_edited.jpg

Informal Interviews
Conversations with 8 individuals about their alarm usage and wake-up experiences.

Sources:

Czeisler, C. A. et al. Circadian regulation of sleep and alertness. Journal of Biological Rhythms
Harvard Medical School. Blue light and sleep–wake regulation. Harvard Health Publishing
Sleep Foundation. How alarm clocks affect stress and waking response
Norman, D. A. The Design of Everyday Things. Basic Books

Key Findings

72fba858-a827-4874-a705-016dc77a5430_edited.jpg

Light Matters

Wake-up methods using gradual light or gentle sound were perceived as less stressful and more refreshing.

90b35f4e-eacc-4e45-b834-df4ad6d639a6_edited.jpg

Light & Tactile Cues Preferred

Participants favored light and gentle vibrations for wake-up, finding them less jarring than loud audio alarms.

84b7f824-c381-46ef-9704-70ae9e9f1bea_edited.jpg

Natural Interaction Improves Compliance

Physical interaction, such as touching to stop an alarm, promoted wakefulness and lowered anxiety levels reported by users.

Why These Features Matter

Design decisions were guided by observed behavioral responses during the sleep-to-wake transition.

Each feature directly addresses a specific human factor identified through research, ensuring that the system supports calm, intentional waking rather than abrupt disruption.

Gradual Light Activation

Minimal Audio Cues

Physical Interaction

Gradual increases in light support circadian-aligned waking and reduce sensory shock, lowering perceived stress during early wake states.

Reducing reliance on abrupt sound avoids startle responses commonly associated with traditional alarms, promoting awareness without urgency.

Requiring intentional touch increases wake-up compliance while maintaining a calm state, supporting cognitive readiness rather than anxiety.

Outcome

Together, these features create a wake-up experience that minimizes stress, supports cognitive transition, and encourages intentional engagement at the start of the day.

System Architecture & Interaction Framework

The wake-up system is structured as a multi-modal interaction framework that coordinates light, sound, and physical input to support a gradual transition from sleep to wakefulness.

Input

System Logic

Outputs

Time

Gradual light ramp

Soft illumination

Ambidient Light 

Audio suppression

Reduced audio cues

User Touch

Touch-based confirmation

Touch-based confirmation

Interaction States

images.png
bfa003fbf33c1d3eacad56fc034123680210ac1290db82ca3ad88cde63c2fde8.jpg
2732671.png
2782895.png

Design rationale informed by established research in circadian rhythm regulation, stress response, and human–computer interaction.

UI & UX

r21.png
7db02f2e-4e13-41f7-bc05-52e7389a6749.png
r24.png
Group 1 (1).png
r22.png
Group 1.png
r25.png
Group 1 (2).png
r23.png
d74bb6a0-81c2-409c-9297-30f1937a5734.png
r26.png
Group 1 (3).png

Interaction Phases

1. Sleep State
The system remains inactive while the user is asleep. The environment is kept dark and quiet to avoid unnecessary stimulation.

2. Pre-Wake State

At a scheduled time, gradual light activation begins.

Illumination increases slowly while audio cues remain suppressed, supporting a calm transition toward wakefulness.

3. Active Wake State
Light reaches a functional level that supports visual awareness.

The user engages through intentional touch to confirm wake-up, reinforcing conscious participation without urgency.

4. Completed Wake State
Upon confirmation, the system transitions to a completed state.

The wake-up process ends, leaving the user in a cognitively ready and emotionally stable condition.

Experience Outcome

By sequencing light, sound, and physical interaction over time, the system minimizes stress, reduces abrupt sensory input, and supports a smoother cognitive transition from sleep to wakefulness.

Prototyping Breath .473.png
frame.png

Form Exploration

Early form studies explored how light diffusion, touch orientation, and soft geometry support a calm, low-stress wake-up experience.

Synthesis: 

Early form studies explored how light diffusion, touch interaction, and spatial orientation could be integrated into a calm bedside object. Concepts prioritized clarity of interaction, gradual illumination, and minimal visual noise over decorative expression.

r1.png

Natual wood top 

Woven fabric body

Warm light diffuser

Matte polymer base

d1a0f2bb-ca4e-40db-aa9b-3f6e08597115.png
759ffc2b-3b75-486a-b986-6139a8b2e594.png
72ffeb2c-fe7a-4a9c-a86a-70d88fac0925.png
e950068c-b1be-4f7d-9af3-f889d85ebd8c.png

Natural wood top

Warm oak veneer top adds a familiar, natural touch

Warm light diffuser

Subtle gold accent ring diffuses soft, natural sunrise light

Woven fabric body

Soft, acoustic fabric provides a tactile and inviting surface

Matte polymer base

Durable matte white base keeps the design clean & minimal

Form Refinement & Material Rationale

Following initial form exploration, selected concepts were refined based on interaction clarity, light diffusion behavior, and physical presence within a sleep environment.

Material & Surface Rationale

1. Soft, diffused material supports gradual light ramp-up and reduces glare in low-light states

2. Subtle matte finishes minimize visual distractions in sleep environments

3. Gentle, inviting surface textures enable comfortable touch interaction

Final System Presentation

The final design resolves the research findings, interaction framework, and form development into a cohesive wake-up system that integrates gradual light activation, minimal audio cues, and intentional touch interaction within a calm bedside object, ensuring that wake-up occurs through controlled sensory progression rather than abrupt interruption.

r1.png
r13.png
r2.png

Design Outcome

The final design resolves research-driven interaction logic into a calm, functional wake-up system that supports a low-stress transition from sleep to wakefulness.

Design Outcome

The final design integrates interaction logic and system behavior into a cohesive physical form that functions as a quiet, supportive presence within the sleep environment. By prioritizing sensory regulation and behavioral intent over immediate responsiveness, the system encourages emotional stability and cognitive readiness at the start of the day.

Reflection & Future Directions

Reflect on the design process and outline future directions for research and development, positioning the project as an ongoing investigation rather than a finalized product.

Reflection:

This project explored how research-driven interaction design can be applied to everyday wake-up experiences. By prioritizing behavioral response, sensory regulation, and system logic over aesthetic expression, the work emphasizes the importance of designing for human transition states rather than isolated functions.

The process reinforced the value of defining clear behavioral goals before form-making, ensuring that design decisions remain traceable to human factors rather than stylistic preference.

Future Directions

1. Studying individual differences in wake-up behavior and circadian sensitivity

2. Exploring adaptive wake-up parameters based on user preference or routine

3. Investigating long-term behavioral effects of gradual, low-stress wake-up systems

4. Expanding the system framework to support broader well-being or sleep-related applications

This work demonstrates how design can function as a research tool—translating behavioral insight into structured systems that support emotional stability and cognitive readiness in everyday life.

r17.jpg

This project proposes a structured interaction framework for low-stress wake-up systems that integrates circadian principles, sensory regulation, and intentional user engagement.

bottom of page